Thanks Proton. It is, but those who should have been doing the necessary bench science experimental work since early 2021 have almost universally refused to risk losing their careers, the result being tragic consequences for humanity. It is not that those with the requisite scientific skills were ignorant of what was at stake. Needless to say, it represents a horrendous moral failure on the part of those who refused to do their duty. It is gratifying indeed that these researchers have tried to fill the gap.
I have tried to circulate this paper as widely as I can with what is admittedly a very miniscule reach. I had hoped to convince some of the more well-known MFM persons to comment on it in detail. A point-by-point detailed critique/refutation would be ideal. In the past, such attempts have been met with complete silence, e.g. when other papers appeared that reported the presence of undisclosed nanotechnology in the CV19 injectables.
I can only conclude that despite the pronouncements of multiple globalists that we will all be changed/biologically altered whether we like it or not, the nanotechnology that has been developed to accomplish it, remains their holy grail, which is not to be acknowledged. A much wider circulation of the invitation to provide a proper scientific critique of this paper is sorely needed.
I assume he had other reasons for Okinawa, maybe personal, position, etc. but he really went hard on Covid since 2020, so as long as they had medical and microscopy professionals on the paper, his helping the language and social conclusions is fine. Okinawa had nearly no "covid" deaths in 2020.
Thanks John, it is an impressive paper. At first it seemed strange a Linguistics guy would be an author but his publication history makes more sense:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=c00mCrcAAAAJ
Thanks Proton. It is, but those who should have been doing the necessary bench science experimental work since early 2021 have almost universally refused to risk losing their careers, the result being tragic consequences for humanity. It is not that those with the requisite scientific skills were ignorant of what was at stake. Needless to say, it represents a horrendous moral failure on the part of those who refused to do their duty. It is gratifying indeed that these researchers have tried to fill the gap.
I have tried to circulate this paper as widely as I can with what is admittedly a very miniscule reach. I had hoped to convince some of the more well-known MFM persons to comment on it in detail. A point-by-point detailed critique/refutation would be ideal. In the past, such attempts have been met with complete silence, e.g. when other papers appeared that reported the presence of undisclosed nanotechnology in the CV19 injectables.
I can only conclude that despite the pronouncements of multiple globalists that we will all be changed/biologically altered whether we like it or not, the nanotechnology that has been developed to accomplish it, remains their holy grail, which is not to be acknowledged. A much wider circulation of the invitation to provide a proper scientific critique of this paper is sorely needed.
Couldn't agree more with you!
Social Semiotics and Propaganda Models? Ya it’s no wonder he found his way to Okinawa and took interest in nano-tech.
I assume he had other reasons for Okinawa, maybe personal, position, etc. but he really went hard on Covid since 2020, so as long as they had medical and microscopy professionals on the paper, his helping the language and social conclusions is fine. Okinawa had nearly no "covid" deaths in 2020.
Also proximity to some really intriguing work at OSIT:
https://youtu.be/IN_nKW3_Kvo
Not sure Japanese biologists want to collaborate with an anti-Covid foreigner!