FYI, If you listen from 40 minutes to 47 minutes you will hear a man working with this tech explain why the nanotech we see is actually up to 2 micrometers cubed. That's what we can all see so easily with normal darkfield scopes properly tuned.
“The major advantage of dark-field microscopy is its ability to visualize truly nanoscale particles (starting from 5 nm for plasmonic noble metal nanoparticles) using a very simple and relatively cheap instrumentation.” As below…
There is a paper as well showing that darkfield plus a mobile ph ( as I use) is now being used by those working with QD's.
There is also the analogy of seeing a lit match at 1km at night. We cannot see the match itself but we can easily see the light. As these dots put out 15 times more light than they take in we can see the light just like that match.
Many claim we need an electron scope to see this stuff. They are being disingenuous or don't know what they are talking about and have not done the research.
Thanks for the information and links. That was very helpful in way of explaining how the term "nano" is actually utilized and understood by people in the field. I was surprised to learn that nano devices such as nano-antennae, nano-transmitters and nano-receivers can be several nanometers in one dimension, up to 1 or more microns in another and 100 or more nanometers in another. As you say, darkfield is very useful for visualizing much of the technology, some of which contains nano-sized components (for lack of a better term) and others micro-sized components and a mixture of both.
Thanks for summarizing this. Also, Urine is also an Easy indicator of Nano structures leaving the body, whether people are actively detoxing or not. That could be part of the Study as well, as well as Saliva. Anyone with a microscope can test their urine, as well as blood with a lancet and a simple instructions on how to use a microscope. One does not need to be certified in LBA to identify some of these larger structures. I think we need more microscopes distributed and accessible to people or like a "Tool Share" in communities. There are so many microscopes on Ebay that are just looking for homes, but obviously money is an obstacle and not a priority in a collapsing economy and society, And the Powers that Be do not want LBA to be even done, Nanos or not. But we must persist in getting our research out there.
We are still confused. Those images in this article that say they are hydrogels or polymers are actually ribbons, microsheets of graphene oxide and graphene quantum dots. PEG hydrogel does not have that structure, what we see is consistent with the images that have been presented by numerous researchers around the world, such as Dr. Campra, as well as in the scientific literature.
We know that these people who have spread this message have done so with the intention of confusing.
It has been proven for years that there is no mRNA or protein of any kind in vaccines.
Last night I was listening to a lecture by several doctors, including Dr. David Nommis, a biochemist and molecular biologist, who explained very well from a scientific point of view why vaccines cannot contain mRNA, it is all a hoax. But to this explanation, there are tests by several doctors who have already demonstrated the absence of mRNA.
To these tests we must add the recent one made by the biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi, and Dr. Sangorrín from Argentina. These two scientists already did it a few years ago.
On the other hand, these photos of fibers are very well determined in the scientific literature and in the numerous studies carried out around the world. They are graphene oxide tapes. You can check this if you buy a solution of reduced graphene oxide from a company that sells graphene, it is identical.
Thanks for the link. I tried to watch the video, but it is in Spanish, and I don't speak or understand that language. Is there an English version or a transcript that could be translated into English? If not, can you provide a short bullet-point summary of the major points covered?
There is no translation that I know of. I am attaching the summary of the study, which was also done a year ago with similar results. Apart from graphene oxide, other undeclared chemical elements have been found, products as rare as technetium, hafnium, uranium, etc., and once we have analyzed the scientific literature we have verified that they are commonly used in nanotechnology. It is as if these elements were necessary to subsequently build nanoantennas, microrouters, etc. Of course, the study does not mention at all PEG hydrogel, which we already know has been used to wrap graphene so that it does not cause further damage. In addition, the PEG hydrogel or polymer is not electrically conductive and is eliminated by the body in 48 hours.
ICP-MS analysis of “vaccines” against “COVID-19”.
ICP-MS analysis of “COVID-19” vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik: 55 undeclared chemical elements.
(1) Lic. in Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Chemistry and Pharmacy. National University of Tucumán.
(2) Physician, Medical Registration 5458, Medical College of Santa Fe, Argentina.
(3) Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology. California, United States of America.
(4) Ph.D. in Biological Sciences, PROBIEN (Institute for Research and Development in Process Engineering, Biotechnology and Alternative Energies) – CONICET-UNCO.
Abstract:
As a result of the high toxicity of the experimental injectable products called “COVID-19 vaccines,” whose use has been vehemently promoted by a massive global vaccination campaign that began at the end of 2020, the global population has developed and suffered from innumerable and varied health conditions in mild, moderate and severe degrees. The number of deaths and adverse effects associated with these injectables far exceeds those produced by the sum of all previous vaccines. In this regard, the atypical increase in sudden deaths and also deaths caused by other ailments was notable. This increase in health disorders in the population began to manifest itself in concomitance with the number of people inoculated and doses administered per person, affecting the inoculated population in particular. Therefore, since 2021 it has become evident that the increase in the quantity and variety of pathologies is clearly associated with the application of these experimental products. Based on the 24 undeclared chemical elements detected by the end of 2023, using SEM-EDX and other methodologies, by different groups of independent researchers, to obtain more precise information on the contents of the vials of the different brands of "COVID-19 vaccines", and considering the limited scope of each methodology used for this purpose, the objective of this study was to corroborate these findings, identify possible additional elements to those already discovered and quantify the quantity of all the elements found. To this end, the contents of vials from different batches of the brands AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, Moderna and Sputnik V were analyzed. 55 undeclared chemical elements were identified with high precision and quantified by ICP-MS.
Is there a list of the 55 elements that you can post in a comment here or provide a link to?
With respect to the following "...the PEG hydrogel or polymer is not electrically conductive and is eliminated by the body in 48 hours.", do you have any further information/evidence to confirm that the PEG hydrogel or polymer you referred to, is eliminated from the body in 48 hours? My question does not mean to imply that the jabs contained mRNA wrapped in PEG hydrogel (the standard explanation). It is in reference to what is known about the behavior of PEG hydrogel in the body.
The study is in pdf, it was sent to us by the biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi and Dr. Sangorrin. I don't know if it is published on the web. In the previous video there is the explanation of the entire study, although it is in Spanish, like the pdf.
It is the second time that both have done the same study, finding, in addition to graphene, other rare metals that should not be there. In the video everything is very well explained.
The hydrogel that the vaccines carry, or the polymer that the vaccines carry is PEG (polyethylene glycol), there is no other type of hydrogel in it. There is no mRNA, that is another lie, and PEG surrounds graphene.
I wish this article didnt have the calamari clots picture as the first thing you see, i know most ppl i try and send this to wont even look at it because of that😕
Thanks for your comment, Heather. It was a difficult decision to make. What has been done to humanity is so grotesque as to defy our ability to explain it to people. A picture is often worth a thousand words, so the saying goes.
How do we strike the right balance between good taste and conveying a reality that is monstrous? How can we help people comprehend the gravity of this crime without seeing the full extent of what is involved? These are all questions I struggle with.
I am interested to know if you think any of the other pictures would be better for the title page. What in your view would be the best one to use? Maybe you have some other pictures that might be more appropriate. I want as many people as possible to read this and understand the full nature of what is at stake. We are being intentionally transformed whether we consent to it, or not. This is a massive crime against humanity.
FYI, If you listen from 40 minutes to 47 minutes you will hear a man working with this tech explain why the nanotech we see is actually up to 2 micrometers cubed. That's what we can all see so easily with normal darkfield scopes properly tuned.
https://rumble.com/v55mbo6-no-we-will-not-shut-up-or-slow-down-you-need-to-start-speaking-up.html
Also - Excerpt:
“The major advantage of dark-field microscopy is its ability to visualize truly nanoscale particles (starting from 5 nm for plasmonic noble metal nanoparticles) using a very simple and relatively cheap instrumentation.” As below…
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969721005465
There is a paper as well showing that darkfield plus a mobile ph ( as I use) is now being used by those working with QD's.
There is also the analogy of seeing a lit match at 1km at night. We cannot see the match itself but we can easily see the light. As these dots put out 15 times more light than they take in we can see the light just like that match.
Many claim we need an electron scope to see this stuff. They are being disingenuous or don't know what they are talking about and have not done the research.
Regards,
Matt.
Thanks for the information and links. That was very helpful in way of explaining how the term "nano" is actually utilized and understood by people in the field. I was surprised to learn that nano devices such as nano-antennae, nano-transmitters and nano-receivers can be several nanometers in one dimension, up to 1 or more microns in another and 100 or more nanometers in another. As you say, darkfield is very useful for visualizing much of the technology, some of which contains nano-sized components (for lack of a better term) and others micro-sized components and a mixture of both.
Thanks for summarizing this. Also, Urine is also an Easy indicator of Nano structures leaving the body, whether people are actively detoxing or not. That could be part of the Study as well, as well as Saliva. Anyone with a microscope can test their urine, as well as blood with a lancet and a simple instructions on how to use a microscope. One does not need to be certified in LBA to identify some of these larger structures. I think we need more microscopes distributed and accessible to people or like a "Tool Share" in communities. There are so many microscopes on Ebay that are just looking for homes, but obviously money is an obstacle and not a priority in a collapsing economy and society, And the Powers that Be do not want LBA to be even done, Nanos or not. But we must persist in getting our research out there.
Thank you. That's helpful.
Well done
This needs to be shared everywhere
We are still confused. Those images in this article that say they are hydrogels or polymers are actually ribbons, microsheets of graphene oxide and graphene quantum dots. PEG hydrogel does not have that structure, what we see is consistent with the images that have been presented by numerous researchers around the world, such as Dr. Campra, as well as in the scientific literature.
We know that these people who have spread this message have done so with the intention of confusing.
It has been proven for years that there is no mRNA or protein of any kind in vaccines.
Last night I was listening to a lecture by several doctors, including Dr. David Nommis, a biochemist and molecular biologist, who explained very well from a scientific point of view why vaccines cannot contain mRNA, it is all a hoax. But to this explanation, there are tests by several doctors who have already demonstrated the absence of mRNA.
To these tests we must add the recent one made by the biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi, and Dr. Sangorrín from Argentina. These two scientists already did it a few years ago.
On the other hand, these photos of fibers are very well determined in the scientific literature and in the numerous studies carried out around the world. They are graphene oxide tapes. You can check this if you buy a solution of reduced graphene oxide from a company that sells graphene, it is identical.
Do you have a link to the Nommis lecture?
https://odysee.com/@RDD:d/An_Chgb9yAhBsXkwsw7yWZ9fiJJAAqGa9L6X8XZUHf8LUgVEinbt_OuasJ6docprtnUzNqkz-i7g-0Zefo3WMXvM:7
Thanks for the link. I tried to watch the video, but it is in Spanish, and I don't speak or understand that language. Is there an English version or a transcript that could be translated into English? If not, can you provide a short bullet-point summary of the major points covered?
There is no translation that I know of. I am attaching the summary of the study, which was also done a year ago with similar results. Apart from graphene oxide, other undeclared chemical elements have been found, products as rare as technetium, hafnium, uranium, etc., and once we have analyzed the scientific literature we have verified that they are commonly used in nanotechnology. It is as if these elements were necessary to subsequently build nanoantennas, microrouters, etc. Of course, the study does not mention at all PEG hydrogel, which we already know has been used to wrap graphene so that it does not cause further damage. In addition, the PEG hydrogel or polymer is not electrically conductive and is eliminated by the body in 48 hours.
ICP-MS analysis of “vaccines” against “COVID-19”.
ICP-MS analysis of “COVID-19” vaccines from AstraZeneca, CanSino, Moderna, Pfizer, Sinopharm and Sputnik: 55 undeclared chemical elements.
Lorena Diblasi (1), Martín Monteverde (2), David Nonis (3), Marcela Sangorrín (4).
(1) Lic. in Biotechnology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Chemistry and Pharmacy. National University of Tucumán.
(2) Physician, Medical Registration 5458, Medical College of Santa Fe, Argentina.
(3) Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology. California, United States of America.
(4) Ph.D. in Biological Sciences, PROBIEN (Institute for Research and Development in Process Engineering, Biotechnology and Alternative Energies) – CONICET-UNCO.
Abstract:
As a result of the high toxicity of the experimental injectable products called “COVID-19 vaccines,” whose use has been vehemently promoted by a massive global vaccination campaign that began at the end of 2020, the global population has developed and suffered from innumerable and varied health conditions in mild, moderate and severe degrees. The number of deaths and adverse effects associated with these injectables far exceeds those produced by the sum of all previous vaccines. In this regard, the atypical increase in sudden deaths and also deaths caused by other ailments was notable. This increase in health disorders in the population began to manifest itself in concomitance with the number of people inoculated and doses administered per person, affecting the inoculated population in particular. Therefore, since 2021 it has become evident that the increase in the quantity and variety of pathologies is clearly associated with the application of these experimental products. Based on the 24 undeclared chemical elements detected by the end of 2023, using SEM-EDX and other methodologies, by different groups of independent researchers, to obtain more precise information on the contents of the vials of the different brands of "COVID-19 vaccines", and considering the limited scope of each methodology used for this purpose, the objective of this study was to corroborate these findings, identify possible additional elements to those already discovered and quantify the quantity of all the elements found. To this end, the contents of vials from different batches of the brands AstraZeneca/Oxford, CanSino Biologics, Pfizer/BioNTech, Sinopharm, Moderna and Sputnik V were analyzed. 55 undeclared chemical elements were identified with high precision and quantified by ICP-MS.
Is there a list of the 55 elements that you can post in a comment here or provide a link to?
With respect to the following "...the PEG hydrogel or polymer is not electrically conductive and is eliminated by the body in 48 hours.", do you have any further information/evidence to confirm that the PEG hydrogel or polymer you referred to, is eliminated from the body in 48 hours? My question does not mean to imply that the jabs contained mRNA wrapped in PEG hydrogel (the standard explanation). It is in reference to what is known about the behavior of PEG hydrogel in the body.
The study is in pdf, it was sent to us by the biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi and Dr. Sangorrin. I don't know if it is published on the web. In the previous video there is the explanation of the entire study, although it is in Spanish, like the pdf.
It is the second time that both have done the same study, finding, in addition to graphene, other rare metals that should not be there. In the video everything is very well explained.
The hydrogel that the vaccines carry, or the polymer that the vaccines carry is PEG (polyethylene glycol), there is no other type of hydrogel in it. There is no mRNA, that is another lie, and PEG surrounds graphene.
In chapter 26 I explain very well the difference between the PEG hydrogel or polymer and graphene oxide. There you will have all the answers: https://covidproject.substack.com/p/history-of-a-genocide-xxvi
Thank you!
I wish this article didnt have the calamari clots picture as the first thing you see, i know most ppl i try and send this to wont even look at it because of that😕
Thanks for your comment, Heather. It was a difficult decision to make. What has been done to humanity is so grotesque as to defy our ability to explain it to people. A picture is often worth a thousand words, so the saying goes.
How do we strike the right balance between good taste and conveying a reality that is monstrous? How can we help people comprehend the gravity of this crime without seeing the full extent of what is involved? These are all questions I struggle with.
I am interested to know if you think any of the other pictures would be better for the title page. What in your view would be the best one to use? Maybe you have some other pictures that might be more appropriate. I want as many people as possible to read this and understand the full nature of what is at stake. We are being intentionally transformed whether we consent to it, or not. This is a massive crime against humanity.
Cut and paste everything but the images.
This is the final proof but when critical thinking is completely absent sadly so much of the brilliant research is for not.